Professor: |
Dr. Christine Nielsen, Director of International Programs |
Office: |
Thumel Business Center, Room 552 |
Office Hours: |
Mondays, 10:00 - 11:00 am
Tuesdays and Thursdays, 10:00-11:00 am
and 1:00 - 2:00 pm |
Phone: |
(410) 837-4992 |
E-mail: |
cnielsen@ubmail.ubalt.edu |
PREREQUISITES
Students must be seniors in the final semester before graduation and
must have successfully completed the Upper Division Core.
REQUIRED TEXT
Strategic Management and Business Policy, 6th edition, by Thomas L.
Wheelen and J. David Hunger, Addison-Wesley, 1998.
http://websolvers.com/wheelen (Textbook website)
PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES
The purpose of the course is to integrate previous studies in the functional
areas of business into a general consideration of corporate purpose and
strategy in both domestic and international contexts. The objectives of
the course are:
1. To create an awareness of the importance of strategic management
as a cornerstone of success in todays global environment.
2. To develop the ability to describe, evaluate, and recommend business
strategies.
3. To relate the functional areas of business to the needs of the organization
as a whole.
4. To enhance analytical and problem-solving abilities in an unstructured
and uncertain environment typical of the working world.
5. To enhance strategic decision-making capabilities, at both the individual
and group levels.
6. To foster written and oral professional communication skills.
7. To develop a deeper understanding of management as a profession and
the impact of personal goals, values, ethics, and attitudes on business
behavior.
METHOD OF INSTRUCTION
The course will be conducted through case analyses, discussions, lectures,
a role-play simulation, and strategic management research reports. Case
Analyses will place students in the position of managers who are responsibility
for strategic management planning and implementation. Lectures will elaborate
on basic issues in the field to ensure a breadth of understanding. Discussions
and Reading Assignments will offer more specific insights into particular
areas of strategic management. The Role-Play Simulation will put students
in the shoes of two entrepreneurial companies who are negotiating a strategic
partnership. The Strategic Management Team Research Paper will serve as
the capstone of this course, calling on students to integrate course material
in order to analyze environmental as well as firm-specific factors, and
to evaluate the firm's strategic management performance.
ASSIGNMENTS AND DUE DATES
Participation
Every class
Test 1
October 3
Test 2
November 2
Test 3
December 14
Peer Evaluations
December 12 |
TEAM ASSIGNMENTS
Strategic Management Team Research Paper Dec. 7
Research Paper Presentation
Nov. 28, 30, Dec. 5, or 7 |
Assignments are due at the beginning of a class period. Assignments
will be accepted up to one week late, but will be penalized one letter
grade. If you are unable to attend class on any date when an assignment
is due, please turn it in before class, or fax your work to Dr. Nielsen
at (410) 837-5675 before class time.
COURSE GRADE EVALUATION CRITERIA
Participation in Class and Case Discussions |
20% |
Test 1 |
15% |
Test 2 |
15% |
Test 3 |
15% |
Strategic Management Team Research Project
Strategic Management Paper (20%)
Class Presentation (5%) |
25% |
Peer Evaluation on Research Project Contributions |
10% |
CLASS PARTICIPATION
Participation in all class sessions is essential for the student to
understand key concepts and to demonstrate mastery of the course material.
Please note that attendance during both presentation dates for the Strategic
Management Team Research Project is required. These contributions will
be reflected in your participation grade. Your contributions to case
analyses and participation in class discussions will be a major component
of your participation grade.
Students will be drawn into in-depth analyses of real case examples
from a variety of industries. Each student will be challenged to make significant
decisions that will affect the strategic interests of the firms under review.
Students will exercise their abilities to apply what they have learned
in a proactive process.
Participation in case discussions should follow the guidelines summarized
below:
- Students contribute to the discussion by
raising points that improve the level of understanding of the situation
being analyzed
- Students listen carefully in order to understand
the comments of others
- Students are open to various points of view,
recognizing there are no "right" or "wrong" answers (...although there
may be "better" and "worse" solutions...)
- Each student will analyze his or her own
approach based on a comparison of the approaches presented by his or her
classmates
"THE MARRIAGE OF TWO CULTURES" NEGOTIATION SIMULATION
A simulation is planned during the first half of the semester. "The
Marriage of Two Cultures" will involve you in an actual negotiation session
that took place in Kuala Lumpur. The experiential technique provides a
means of understanding underlying value systems and major concepts that
can not be learned through the more passive lecture technique.
"THE STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT TEAM RESEARCH PROJECT:
A DESCRIPTION OF THE CAPSTONE PROJECT FOR THIS COURSE
Student teams will describe and analyze the strategic management process
of a local area firm, including the following components of a Strategic
Audit:
1. Current Situation
2. Corporate Governance
3. External Environment (Both Societal and Industry Analysis)
4. Internal Environment
5. Analysis of Strategic Factors
6. Alternatives and Recommendations
7. Implementation
8. Evaluation and Control
Each team will have the opportunity to work with a "mentor" from a Maryland
firm who will be available to answer questions, and to provide information
and/or interviews. The chosen firm can be large or small, and information
compiled can be from both primary and secondary sources. The report should
illustrate applications of some of the major tools demonstrated during
the semester, such as the EFAS, IFAS, SFAS Tables, Porter's Industry Analysis,
and the Strategic Audit. This research paper has a maximum length of 15
pages, but appendices, tables, and figures can be added as appendices.
The text should be single-spaced, 10-12 characters per inch, with one-inch
margins. Be sure to number pages. References must be cited in the
paper using footnotes or endnotes. A bibliography should be included. Website
references are valuable, but the reference list should not be exclusively
comprised of websites. Interviews should be cited, and included in the
bibliography.
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT PAPER PRESENTATIONS
Each team will present a summary of its research work during one class
session. Teams are encouraged to use audio-visual, and other graphic aids
to enliven their presentations. Tables, graphs, and figures should be used
for concise presentation of comparative data. Guest speakers from the companies
with which teams have worked will be encouraged to participate. Presentations
are not expected to exceed 30 minutes; however, the addition of a guest
speaker could increase the presentation period. Presentations will be scheduled
in advance. Presentations will be evaluated by your classmates.
PEER EVALUATION
Each student will be evaluated by his or her team members in a confidential
report provided to Dr. Nielsen. These evaluations are to be signed
and submitted to the professor in a sealed envelope on December 7.
(Submissions by e-mail will not be accepted.) Each student will be
rated by their peers on the following criteria: a) Amount of work done;
b) Intellectual contribution; c) Reliability; and d) Group relations.
Each factor for each team member should be considered separately.
Then, a numerical evaluation should be assigned based on a scale of 0 to
10 (nil contribution to outstanding) on the basis of your evaluation of
each team member. A paragraph or two of explanation for the grade
assigned should be submitted for each team member evaluated. General
guidelines for peer evaluations are provided below.
Four factors should be considered separately for each team member:
1. Amount of work done: interviews, meetings attended,
research and analyses, report writing, typing, editing, etc.
2. Intellectual contribution: ideas, provocative suggestions,
sage advice, useful devil's advocacy, etc.
3. Reliability: the team member's performance at meeting
deadlines, attendance at meetings, delivery of work promised, etc.
4. Group relations: leadership supplied, constructive actions
vs. disruptive behavior, assistance provided to teammates, etc.
The following guidelines should apply:
1. Identical evaluations of all team members are unlikely.
Please do not avoid the responsibility of this procedure.
2. Very high and very low evaluations should be given extra substantiation
in writing.
The degree to which these evaluations will be reflected in the grades
assigned by the professor will depend upon the quality of the substantiation
evidence.
GENERAL NOTES
1. The MGMT 475 course schedule is subject to change based on the availability
of guest speakers and other factors. Dr. Nielsen will communicate any changes
during class time, or through e-mail to you. Please check for such messages
regularly.
2. Students should bring their textbooks to all classes.
3. Do not leave assignments in Dr. Nielsen's mailbox. Assignments should
be handed in during class directly to Dr. Nielsen.
4. Students are encouraged to keep a copy of all work turned in. You
may wish to have a copy to guide your remarks during class discussions.
Misplaced work or lost work is the responsibility of the student to replace.
UNIVERSITY OF BALTIMORE ACADEMIC INTEGRITY POLICY
Students have the responsibility to encourage and support an atmosphere
of academic honesty. To encourage honest and reasonable use of sources,
students are expected to utilize appropriate methods of documentation for
written work. Students are to recognize that faculty considering written
materials will assume such utilization. Students are to do their won work
and to make all reasonable efforts to prevent the occurrence of academic
dishonesty. They are to set an example to other students be refraining
from acts of cheating, plagiarism, or other violations of the Academic
Integrity Policy.
Course Schedule
Date |
Assignments Due |
Topics |
Aug 31 |
|
Introductions and Course Overview
The Tower Exercise Preparations- Teams Meet |
Sept 5 |
Read Chapt. 1 |
The Tower Exercise and Bebriefing |
Sept 7 |
Read Chapt. 2
Prepare Case #1 for class discussion: "The Recalcitrant Director"
at Byte, Inc." |
Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility
"The Recalcitrant Director" at Byte, Inc." Case Discussion |
Sept 12 |
Read Chapt. 3
Read the Strategic Practice Exercise, p. 78-79 |
Environmental Scanning and Industry Analysis
Tool:
Porter's Industry Analysis |
Sept14 |
Prepare Case #10 for class discussion: "Celestial Seasonings, Inc." |
"Celestial Seasonings, Inc." Case Discussion
Tools: Industry Matrix, EFAS Table, Porter's Industry Analysis |
Sept 19 |
Read Chapt. 4
Prepare Case #8 for class discussion: "Ben & Jerry's Homemade,
Inc.: "Yo! I'm Your CEO!" |
Internal Scanning/Audit: Organizational Analysis
"Ben & Jerry's Homemade, Inc." Case Discussion
Tool: IFAS Table |
Sept 21 |
Read Chapt. 14, and Appendices 14.A, B, C |
Suggestions for Case Analysis: Researching the Case Situation
Library and Electronic Resources for the Strategic Audit |
Sept 26 |
Read Chapts. 5 & 6. |
Strategy Formulation:
Situation Analysis & Business Strategy
Corporate Strategy |
Sept 28 |
Prepare Case #21 for class discussion: "Reebok International, Ltd.
(1995): The Nike Challenge" |
"Reebok International" Case Discussion
Tools: SFAS Table, TOWS Matrix,BCG Growth-Share Matrix |
Oct 3 |
Prepare for TEST 1 |
Test 1 during class period. |
Oct 5 |
Read Chapts. 7 & 8 |
Strategy Formulation (Continued):
Functional Strategy & Strategic Choice
Strategy Implementation: Organizing for Action |
Oct 10 |
Prepare Case #17 for class discussion: "Harley-Davidson, Inc. (1995):
A Waiting List for New Motorcycles |
"Harley-Davidson" Case Discussion |
Oct 12 |
Read Chapt. 9
Bring in article featuring a successful business leader |
Leadership in Strategic Management
Strategy Implementation: Staffing & Directing |
Oct 17 |
Read Chapt. 10 |
Evaluation & Control |
Oct 19 |
Read Chapt. 11 |
Strategic Issues in Managing Technology and Innovation |
Oct 24 |
Prepare for Case #11 for class discussion: Microsoft Corporation:
First Twenty Years" |
"Microsoft" Case Discussion |
Oct 26 |
Read Chapt. 12 |
Strategic Issues in Entrepreneurial Ventures and Small Businesses |
Oct. 31 |
Strategic Management Teams Meet |
No Class |
Nov 2 |
Prepare for TEST 2 |
Test 2 during class period |
Nov 7 |
Strategic Management Teams meet |
No class meeting. |
Nov 9 |
Read "Marriage of Two Cultures" Case
(Handed out in class) |
Preparations for "Marriage of Two Cultures" negotiating session
begin. |
Nov 14 |
Prepare for negotiation session
Bring answers to case questions to class |
Teams meet to plan negotiating strategies. Summaries handed in before
class ends. |
Nov 16 |
Prepare for negotiation session |
"Marriage of Two Cultures" Negotiating Session |
Nov 21 |
Prepare negotiation evaluation and bring to class |
Debriefing: Discussion of the Negotiation Process and Results |
Nov 23 |
Prepare Turkey or Vegetarian substitute |
Enjoy a Happy Thanksgiving! |
Nov 28 |
Strategic Management Team Presentations Begin |
Strategic Management Research Presentations begin |
Nov 30 |
Strategic Management Team Presentations |
Strategic Management Research Presentations |
Dec 5 |
Strategic Management Team Presentations |
Strategic Management Research Presentations |
Dec 7 |
Strategic Management Research Papers Due |
Strategic Management Research Presentations end |
Dec 12 |
Peer Evaluations Due
Bring review questions to class |
Course in Review Class |
Dec 14 |
Prepare for TEST 3 |
Test 3 during final exam period |
PREPARATIONS FOR CASE DISCUSSIONS
For cases drawn from your textbook, please consider how you would answer
the following priority questions:
Case 1: The Recalcitrant Director
If you were one of the ten members, how would you have initially voted
for the proposal? What would your vote be after the recess in the meeting?
Why?
Should the Byte executives tell the town administrators, and the potential
employees that this is a temporary plant for three years?
What impact does a plant closing have on a small town like Plainville?
What impact does the closing have on the employees?
Can you suggest any compromise for the present impasse?
If you were Elliott, would you call for a vote on your proposal or postpone
the vote until next meeting?
Case 10: Celestial Seasonings, Inc.
Assess the external factors that are having a major impact on Celestial
Seasonings.
Specifically describe the industry forces that are having a major impact
on Celestial Seasonings.
What are the major opportunities and threats facing the company's future
health?
What are the strategic issues facing the management team?
What alternatives are open to Celestial Seasonings in confronting the
key issue or issues you identified in the previous question?
What is your recommended plan of action, and how would you implement
it?
Prepare an EFAS Table for Celestial Seasonings. Bring the Table and
Total Weighted Score with you to class.
Case 8: Ben & Jerry's Homemade, Inc.
What are the strengths and weaknesses of Ben & Jerry's?
What can Robert Holland do his first year as CEO to turn Ben & Jerry's
around?
Why did Ben & Jerry's pay so little attention to the strategic choice
of exporting ice cream?
Discuss the industry analysis of super premium ice cream in the U.S.
What do you think of the "Yo! I'm Your CEO!" Contest?
Can Ben & Jerry's management with limited resources effectively
compete with Haagen-Dazs, whose parent company, Pillsbury Company, has
deep pockets?
Prepare an IFAS Table For Ben & Jerry's. Bring the Table and Total
Weighted Score with you to class.
Case 21: Reebok International, Ltd.
What are the threats and opportunities facing Reebok?
What are the strengths and weaknesses of Reebok?
Describe Reebok's strategic factors.
What is the impact of executive turnover on this company?
What impact does international division sales have on overall corporate
sales?
What does Paul Firemand do to replace Nike as number one in three to
five years? (Be specific.)
Case 17: Harley-Davidson, Inc.
Describe the organization structure at Harely-Davidson.
Prepare an SFAS Table for Harley-Davidson. Bring the Table and Total
Weighted Score with you to class. Be prepared to defend your score.
Case 11: Microsoft Corporation: First Twenty Years
Discuss Bill Gates leadership style.
Describe Microsoft's corporate culture.
Why was Windows 95 the most successful introduction of a new product?
Why did Gates change his strategies on Internet alliances?
Would you buy stock in Microsoft? Why or why not?
Prepare an SFAS Table for Microsoft. Bring the Table and Total Weighted
Score with you to class.