| 
         Iliad 
        Passages 
       
        
          
  
        
        Achilles Curses 
        Agamemnon
        
        
          
        
        Iliad I, ll 262ff (Fagles p 85) 
        
        
        Consider in Book I how the argument between Achilles 
        and Agamemnon 
        develops.
        What circumstances bring them together? How does each character see his 
        situation?
        Are differences in views worth considering? 
        Is one wrong and the other 
        right? Or is such an argument highly likely, given the characters 
        involved and current circumstances?
        Homer identifies the rage of Achilles 
        as ruinous, but understandable 
        given the temperaments
        and roles of the characters, together with current circumstances.
        (How also does Chryses engage Apollo 
        in his dispute with Agamemnon?) 
        
          
        
        Odysseus Meets Thersites
        
        
          
        
        Iliad II ll 245ff (Fagles, p 106) 
        
        
        Consider in Book II the test Agamemnon offers 
        his soldiers. The foot 
        soldier Thersites makes 
        an appealing argument: he and fellow common 
        soldiers 
        will likely die in battle without the possibility of fame 
        accorded soldiers superior in ancestry, training, arms 
        and company. How 
        does his engagement with Odysseus appear to his fellow soldiers and to 
        fighters with seeking fame?
        (How, incidentally, do Homeric dreams or prophecies really work?) 
        
          
        
        Aphrodite Works
        
        
        
          
        
        Iliad III ll 146ff (Fagles, 
        p 132) 
        
        
        Consider in Book III Helen’s involvements with 
        her rival suitors Menelaus and Paris.
        How does she 
        come to consider each suitor at particular times? 
        How do 
        her rivals variously act
        in particular circumstances. How might the tracing of her involvements 
        reveal the powers of Aphrodite? 
        
          
        
        Pandarus Strikes
        
        
          
        
        Iliad IV ll 100ff (Fagles, p 148) 
        
        
        Consider in Book IV the attempt by Pandarus to save Troy by killing 
        Menelaus. Athena, of course, tricks Pandarus.  But Pandarus’ 
        understanding of strategy, together with 
        the recognized skill with which 
        he approaches his quarry deserves the attention of Homeric audiences. 
        And like reasoning in the face of arguments, Homeric truces 
        seldom 
        ensure peace. 
        
          
        
        Diomedes Wounds Ares
        
        
        
          
        
        Iliad V ll 998ff (Fagles, 
        p 192) 
        
        
        Consider in Book V Diomedes as an inspired hero. 
        How does his attacks on 
        Ares and on Aphrodite 
        appear to audiences? Why does Zeus hate Ares 
        most 
        of all the Olympian gods?
        (Consider also 
        Sarpedon, the Trojan supporter favored by Zeus, 
        who next 
        to Hector appears as the most 
        worthy of fame.) 
        
          
        
        Hector Meets Andromache
        
        
          
        Iliad VI, 439ff (Fagles, p 208) 
        
        
        Consider in Book VI the meeting of Hector and Andromache. How does each 
        consider current circumstances and anticipate specific consequences 
        of Hector’s choices? Homer’s audiences were primarily Greek. How might 
        Greek audiences appreciate the anticipated futures of Hector, “killer of 
        men”, and 
        his family? 
        
          
        
        Hector Meets Ajax
        
        
          
        
        Iliad VII, V ll 236ff (Fagles, p 221) 
        
        Consider in Book VII 
        the actions of Hector and Ajax. 
        In Book III Paris and Menelaus fought as rivals for Helen’s favor. Now 
        Hector has challenged Greeks to put forward 
        a Greek fighter to meet him 
        in single combat. Selected 
        by lot from the nine great fighters who 
        respond to 
        the challenge, Ajax 
        is recognized as the clear favorite, 
        a testament to his fighting 
        prowess. What makes 
        this extended engagement worth particular attention? 
        What distinguishes each fighter? How does craftsmanship work? When 
        encroaching darkness ends the combat, 
        how do fighters and audiences 
        respond? 
        
          
        
        Hera & Athena 
        Face Zeus
        
        
          
        Iliad VIII, ll 504ff (Fagles, p 245) 
        
        Consider in Book 
        VIII the competition among gods 
        and goddesses. Darkness ended the 
        confrontations 
        of Ajax and Hector, but the Greeks took from Ajax’s 
        actions faith in their rising power. Now, as darkness grows once more, 
        Hera and Athena, united in inspiring Greeks, find Zeus’ inspiration of 
        Trojans dispiriting.  Homeric audiences would know that Troy eventually 
        falls. 
        What engages them, then, in depictions of Greek suffering, 
        including the prediction that Achilles’ beloved companion Patroclus will 
        fall before Hector? How does the opposition of Zeus to Hera and Athena 
        work? 
        
          
        
        Phoenix Counsels 
        Achilles
        
        
          
        
        Iliad IX, ll 523ff (Fagles, p 266) 
        
        Consider in Book IX 
        the recognition by Agamemnon 
        that he must convince Achilles to return to 
        battle. 
        What influences his choice of ambassadors? 
        What conditions does 
        Agamemnon accept? 
        Consider, for example, the character, actions and 
        account presented by Phoenix. How might he expect Achilles to understand 
        the story he offers? 
        
          
        
        
        Spies Compete
         
        
        
          
         Iliad X, 
        ll 523ff (Fagles, p 291) 
        Consider in Book X the strategy of Diomedes and Odysseus in undermining 
        Trojan forces. Sleepless 
        from anxiety, Agamemnon together with the wise 
        elder Nestor, initiates a spying mission. Diomedes and Odysseus appear 
        not just as among the greatest 
        of fighters, but as superior in craft. 
        Hector, equally sleepless, considering how to take advantage of rising 
        Trojan power, initiates his own spying mission. But 
        the satisfied 
        Trojans lacking inspiration for such 
        unheroic activity, send out Dolon, 
        a young untested 
        fighter, the sole son among five sisters, no  match 
        for Diomedes and Odysseus. Homeric audiences would know that the Iliad 
        ending, despite the death of Hector, despite the fated death of 
        Achilles, is inconclusive. Odysseus’ treachery in a surprise attack from 
        within 
        the Palladian horse left at Troy as Greeks sail 
        from Troy will 
        make of heroic hand-to-hand combat 
        a fading memory of honor through 
        personal courage. 
        
          
        
        Sarpedon Seeks 
        Fame
        
        
          
        
        Iliad XII, ll 337ff (Fagles, p 334) 
        
        Consider in Book XII 
        the simile which precedes the challenge Zeus’ favorite, Sarpedon, offers 
        to his young companion Glaucon. Crowded before each side of Greek 
        ramparts, fighters volley boulders back and forth, so thick they appear 
        to Zeus above as snowflakes, but to men below as instruments of crushing 
        death. When even Hector fails to break through the ramparts, Sarpedon 
        calls to 
        his young fellow-fighter Glaucon to rise to the greatest 
        of 
        risks, to lead Trojans through Greek fortifications. 
        What makes his 
        claim to fame credible and memorable? 
        
          
        
        Hera Seduces Zeus 
        
          
        Iliad XIV, ll 187ff (Fagles, p 374) 
        
        Consider in Book XIV 
        how Hera, resentful of Zeus, 
        plans to remove him from action through 
        seduction. 
        Her likely success appears in the impression she 
        makes as 
        Zeus first sees her: “at one glance the lust 
        came swirling over him, 
        making his heart race, fast as 
        the first time—all unknown to their 
        parents—they rolled 
        in bed, they locked and surged in love.”  How does 
        Hera create such an impression? 
        
          
        
        Sarpedon’s Last 
        Stand 
          
        Iliad XVI, ll 499ff (Fagles, p 426) 
        Consider in Book XVI the consequences of Sarpedon’s encouragement to his 
        friend Glaucon in Book XII before storming Greek ramparts. Most beloved 
        by Zeus of all mortals (for good reason), Sarpedon will not finally 
        escape his fate. Hera reminds Zeus of unfortunate consequences 
        if 
        immortals undermined fated outcomes, but her stronger reminder would be 
        that not even Zeus can counter fate. (consider also the conditions 
        Achilles imposes on Patroclus, who, armed with Achilles’ war gear, can 
        no longer hold back from fighting. Patroclus’ death 
        will change Achilles 
        irrevocably. Patroclus’ dying words 
        to Hector anticipate Hector’s fated 
        meeting with Achilles. 
        
          
        
        Hector Assumes 
        Achilles’ Arms 
          
        Iliad XVII, ll 159ff (Fagles, p 447) 
        Consider in Book XVII how Sarpedon’s death leads Hector, armed with the 
        war gear of Achilles, to terrify dispirited Greeks. Glaucus, grieving 
        for Sarpedon’s death, seeks 
        to recover his body. Goading Hector for 
        failing to turn back Ajax 
        from defending Patroclus’ body, and thereby losing the means to exchange 
        Greek for Trojan, Glaucus stirs Hector to call back the arms of Achilles 
        from Troy, 
        to arm himself as Achilles. Greeks will no longer miss Achilles presence 
        foremost among them in battle, but will face Achilles in the person of 
        Hector, killer of men. Zeus, grieveing also for Sarpedon, anticipates 
        Hector’s rampage, but anticipates as well the effect it will have on 
        Achilles. 
        
          
        
        Hephaestus 
        Shields Achilles 
          
        Iliad XVIII, ll 558ff (Fagles, p 483) 
        Consider in Book XVIII how Achilles rejoins Greek fighters to attack 
        Troy. Unmoved by all offers by Agamemnon 
        to make amends (consider 
        Agamemnon’s offer to pick 
        any of the King’s daughters as a bride!), 
        Achilles discovers his love for Patroclus, and his attending sense of 
        responsibility, moves him personally, moves him with 
        a force greater 
        even than fame, to seek out Hector, 
        to avenge the death of Patroclus. 
        Not reasonable, 
        but impassioned, Achilles turns his rage from Agamemnon 
        to Hector. Passion, not reason, rules. Thetis moves Haephestus, the 
        smith-god, to craft new arms for Achilles, arms crafted with unequaled 
        technology, and with 
        fearful pictorial craft. 
        
          
        
        Achilles Goes 
        Berserk 
        
          
        Iliad XXI, ll 110ff (Fagles, p 523) 
        Consider in Book XXI first the rage at work as Achilles slaughters 
        Trojans. How does the death of his beloved companion Patroclus lead him 
        to specific actions? Lyaon, a Trojan prince too young to fight appear 
        before Achilles, cutting fig saplings for chariot wheels.  Just eleven 
        days returned by ransom, he hopes his value will once more spare his 
        life. Achilles, Patroclus in mind, will not spare him, but consider his 
        linking of Lyaon’s fate and his own. Fired up with slaughter, however, 
        Achilles rages against 
        all life about the River Scamander. What, then, 
        brings about an end to his rampage? 
        
          
        
        Hector Faces 
        Achilles 
          
        Iliad XXII, ll 293ff (Fagles, p 549) 
        
        Consider in Book 
        XXII Hector’s reactions to his discovery that the brother he most relies 
        on was nowhere near him, vanished. Aware that Achilles’ will overcome 
        him, that Achilles vengeance will drive him to feed the corpse 
        to dogs, 
        Hector none-the-less attacks “like a soaring eagle launching down from 
        the dark clouds to earth to snatch some helpless lamb or trembling 
        hare.” Can we see Achilles, at the moment of his triumph, as Hector 
        does, 
        as a helpless lamb or trembling hare? 
        
          
        
        Patroclus’ Final 
        Appearance 
          
        Iliad XXIII, ll 65ff (Fagles, p 561) 
        Consider in Book XXIII the surprise of Achilles when 
        the shade of Patroclus appears, chiding him for forgetfulness and neglect. How does 
        Patroclus help Achilles to recall their relationship in the flesh, and 
        to recognize the distance between those times 
        and those to come as 
        shades as shades? 
        
          
        
        Priam Joins 
        Achilles 
          
        XXIV, ll 540ff (Fagles, p 603) 
        Consider in Book XXIX how Priam stirs Achilles’ heart 
        to enable the 
        release of Hector. Achilles previously raged at Agamemnon, refusing all 
        terms for engagement. 
        Achilles subsequently chokes the river Scamander 
        with Trojan corpses, genesis in reerse. Achilles delays 
        his departure 
        from Patroclus as long as possible, refusing to accept his loss. How 
        will Priam persuade him to end 
        his rage? Prima’s appearance in the Greek 
        camp stuns 
        his audience: “Awesome—as when the grip of madness seizes one 
        who murders a man in his own fatherland and, flees abroad to foreign 
        shores, to a wealthy, noble host, and a sense of marvel runs through all 
        who see him— 
         so Achilles marveled, beholding majestic Priam. 
        His men marveled too, 
        trading startled glances.” 
        Why does Priam, not Achilles, appear as an exiled murderer? And how does 
        his appearance and words 
        stir Achilles? 
        
   |