University of Baltimore
University of
Baltimore: Division of Applied Behavioral Sciences in the College of Arts and
Sciences
Job Analysis APPL 651.185 (3 credit hours)
Fall 2021
Instructor: Tom Mitchell,
Ph.D.
Phone: (410) 812 0354
Web;
Homepage:
http://home.ubalt.edu/tmitch
Email:
TMITCHELL@UBALT .EDU
Class meets: Tuesdays
8:15 - 9:30 PM (Hybrid Class)
Classroom:
ZOOM remote
Office:
Learning Commons, (LC) 411
Office Hours: by appointment
·
Academic
Integrity Policy Turnitin
· Rwg calculator (Peter Leeds)
·
UB site for travel
funds to conferences (Scroll down)
·
UB Achievement and
Learning Center
Course Catalog Description:
Survey of job analysis methodology and issues, using experiential projects. Includes tools used in conducting a job analysis: data gathering techniques, legal and technical standards and the Occupational Information Network. Emphasis is on variation in approach dependent on subsequent application of the results.
Course objectives:
This course is intended to provide you with a hands-on approach to learn more about job analysis, and its purposes in human resource system such as selection, training, compensations, and performance appraisals.
Student Learning Outcomes
By completion of this course the student will be able to:
(1) Conduct a job analysis to determine the duties, tasks, and KSAOs needed for developing selection, performance appraisal, and compensation systems,
(2) Analyze job analysis data to identify individual differences and position requirements that must be addressed in selection, performance appraisal, training, and compensation systems,
(3) Present the findings from a job analysis to class verbally with graphic visuals..
(4) Write a complete report to be submitted to the organization for which the job analysis was conducted.
Texts required:
Brannick, M. T., Levine, E. L., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Job and Work Analysis: Methods, research, and applications for human resources management. 2nd ed., Sage pub. ISBN13: 978-1-4129-3746-7 See: Brannick et al: http://www.jobandworkanalysis.com/
Supplemental readings:
Sackett, Paul R. Laczo, Roxanne M. ; In: Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology, Vol. 12. Borman, Walter C. (Ed.); Ilgen, Daniel R. (Ed.); Klimoski, Richard J. (Ed.); Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons Inc, 2003. pp. 21-37. [Chapter 2] Handout in class
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., and Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability wit and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 1, 85-98.
James, L.R., Demaree, R.G., and Wolf, G. (1993). r wg: an assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 2, 306-309,
Class format: Lecture, class discussions and
group discussions.
Attendance: not mandatory but will be recorded. Students are expected to be
in class with video camera
on before the beginning of class
Course
requirements:
1. Demonstration of an understanding of assigned
readings
2. successful completion of two exams
3. Completion
of job analysis project
Example of a good JA project
(Pavisic)
Grade determination: Two Exams (50%) + Job Analysis (50%) = 100% (each exam = 25%)
Range of letter grades for each report: A, B+, B, C+, C, F
Web Sources:
·
Internet Resources (from Brannick et al.)
·
http://www.siop.org Society for Industrial/Organizational Psychology
(see IO related sites) Psychology journals on line
·
SIOP
Exchange http://siopexchange.typepad.com/the_siop_exchange/
·
Society for Human Resources
Management http://www.shrm.org
·
Chesapeake Human Resources
Association http://www.chra.com
·
Personnel Testing Council of
Washington D.C. http://www.ptcmw.org/
·
Journal
of Applied Psychology
Schedule of Dates and Assignments:
Week 1: August 31 Chapter 1 Introduction
·
SHRM Job Analysis
Manual pdf
·
Job Analysis Methodology (Quirin)
Week 2: September 7 Chapter 9 Doing a Job Analysis Study
·
How to write a Job Description
Pitt University
·
Rwg calculator (Peter Leeds)
· Descriptives and Sd error mean for tasks (see files in Sakai: SMEs as case and Tasks as vars.spv)
· Kappa in SPSS to compute agreement for categorical data
·
ICC and r for Tasks (see files in Sakai: ICC
TASK as case and SMEs as v
Week 3: September 14 Chapter 2 Work Oriented Methods Exercises Review Questions Research Questions
*** JA project Assignments ***
·
Guidelines
Oriented JA Method (GOJA) Biddle
Consulting Group
·
Dictionary
of Occupational Titles (DOT)
o Article: The Critical
Incident Technique in Service Research Dwayne D. Gremler
Week 4: September 21 Chapter 3 Worker Oriented Methods
·
Job Char Model (JCM)
power point (JCM) J.R Hackman & Oldham
·
Job
Diagnostic Survey (JDS)
SUMMARY OF JDS (Datner's)
·
JA example:
State of CA Job Analysis: Uniformed Patrol Officer
·
Position Analysis Questionnaire (PAQ)
Week 5: September 28 Chapter 3 Worker Oriented Methods (con't)
*** Begin JA projects ***
·
Article:
(Sakia files: Sackett, P. R., & Laczo, R. M. (2003). Chapter 2: Job and work
analysis. Handbook of Psychology, v. 12. Borman, Ilgen,
Klimoski, Eds.. 21-37.
Week 6: October 5 Chapter 4 Hybrid Methods
·
C-Jam template (Alyssa
Gradus, SHA)
Week 7: October 12 Chapter 5 Management and Teams
o Guide
for Writing Functional Competencies
o ICF Competency Modeling white paper
o European Org for
Safety of Air Navigation - see Chapter 3: Competency modeling.
o Week 8: October 19
Week
9: October 26 Chapter 6 Job
Analysis and the Law
Week 10: November 2 Chapter 7 Job Description, Performance Appraisal, Evaluation and Design
Discussion of inter-judge
reliability files in your SAKAI files directory. Please reveiw
them before clas
Week 11: November 9 Chapter 8 Staffing and Training
Week 12: November 16 Chapter 10 The
Future of Job Analysis
Week 13: November 23
Week 14: November 30
Presentation
of Job Analysis
Week 15: December 7
Internet resources: (From Brannick et al.)
· O*NET Resource Center
This is the main O*NET web site that provides access to all things O*NET,
including the the online O*NET database and the
questionnaires used to collect data.
· O*NET (Department of Labor site)
This is the main Department of Labor (DOL) web site that provides an overview
of O*NET and provides links to a variety of O*NET applications. The DOL is the
government sponsor of O*NET.
· Dictionary of Occupational Titles
(DOT)
For those of you simply cannot do without the classic Dictionary of
Occupational Titles, the Office of Administrative Law Judges have you covered.
They have put online all the DOT job titles (although not in as convenient form
as O*NET). Enjoy!
· Standard Occupational
Classification (SOC)
O*NET data is collected on the occupations contained in the Standard
Occupational Classification. In case you're wondering what the SOC is, the
Bureau of Labor Statistics is your best buddy.
· Job Analysis
Discussion List
This is an email based discussion list run by R.J.
Harvey in which questions are emailed to a list of subscribers. Although this
list is not very active, when questions are posted, responses are typically
swift and comprehensive.
· OPM Job
Analysis Methodology
Ever wonder how the Office of Personnel Management conducts a job analysis?
Wonder no more. Their process is online, complete with sample worksheets.
· Position
Analysis Questionnaire (PAQ)
The PAQ is one of the classic job analysis systems. They are alive and online.
REFERENCES :
No |
|
1 |
Anderson, L., & Wilson, S. (1997). Critical incident technique. In D. L. Whetzel & G. R. Wheaton (Eds.). Applied measurement methods in industrial psychology, Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. (p. 89-112)
|
2 |
Baranowski, L. E., & Anderson, L. E. (2005). EXAMINING RATING SOURCE VARIATION IN WORK BEHAVIOR TO KSA LINKAGES. Personnel Psychology. 58, 1041-1054.
|
3 |
Cascio, W. F. (1991). Job analysis. (Chapter 10). Applied Psychology in Personnel Management (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
|
4 |
Chang, I.,& Kleiner, B. H. (2002). How to conduct job analysis effectively. Management Research News. Vol.25, Iss. 3; pg. 73-81.
|
5 |
Cunningham, J. W. (1996). Generic job descriptors: A likely direction in occupational analysis. Military Psychology, 8 (3), 247-262. (validity generalization)
|
6 |
Gatewood R. D., & Feild, H. S. (1994). Human Resource Selection (3rd Ed.) (Chapter 7,8, & 9). Fort Worth, TX: Dryden Press. Ghorpade, J. V. (1988). Job Analysis: A
handbook for the human resources director. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice
Hall.
|
7 |
Goldstein, I. L., Zedeck, S., & Schneider, B. (1993). An exploration of the job-analysis-content validity process. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. (physical fidelity; psychological
|
8 |
Guion, R.M. (1998). Assessment, measurement, & prediction for personnel decisions (pp. 57-102). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. (detail versus generality; O*NET; strategic job analysis; caveats of job analysis)
|
9 |
Harvey, R. J. (1991). Job analysis. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.
|
10 |
Hedge, J. W., Borman, W. C., & Bruskiewicz, K. T. (2004). The development of an integrated performance category system for supervisory jobs in the U.S. Navy. Military Psychology, 16(4), 231-243.
|
11 |
Jeanneret, R., & Strong, M. H. (2003). Linking O*NET job analysis information to job requirement predictors: An O*NET application. Personnel Psychology. 56, 465-492.
|
12 |
Lawler, E.E. (1994). From job-based to competency-based organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 3-15.
|
13 |
Levine, E.L., Maye, D.M., Ulm, R.A., & Gordon, T.R. (1997). A methodology for developing and validating minimum qualifications (MQs). Personnel Psychology, 50, 1009-1023.
|
14 |
Lievens, F., Sanchez, J. I., & De Corte, W. (2004). EASING THE INFERENTIAL LEAP IN COMPETENCY MODELING: THE EFFECTS OF TASK-RELATED INFORMATION AND SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTISE. Personnel Psychology. 57, 881-904.
|
15 |
Lindell, M. K., Clause, C. S., Brandt, C. J., & Landis, R. S. (1998). Relationship between organizational context and job analysis task ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 769-776.
|
16 |
Maurer, R.J. & Tross, S.A. (2000). SME committee vs field job analysis ratings: Convergence, cautions, and a call. Journal of Business & Psychology, 14(3), 489-499. (tie to Tannenbaum & Wesley, 1993)
|
17 |
McClelland, D.C. (1998). Identifying competnecies with behavioral event interviews. Psychological Science, 9(5), 331-339. (patterns of competencies; "tipping points"; competency algorithm; critical incidents)
|
18 |
McCloy, R. (1999). Job Performance and Skill Requirements: An I/O and OB Research Agenda for the Millennium. Workshop conducted at IO/OB, George Mason University. (O*NET)
|
19 |
Morgeson, F. P., & Campion, M. A. (1997). Social cognitive sources of potential inaccuracy in job analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82 (5), 627-655.
|
20 |
Morgeson, F. P., Delaney-Klinger, K., & Mayfield, M. S. (2004). Self-Presentation Processes in Job Analysis: A Field Experiment Investigating Inflation in Abilities, Tasks, and Competencies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 674-686.
|
21 |
Pearlman, K. (1980). Job families: A review and discussion of their implications for personnel selection. Psychological Bulletin, 87 (1), 1-28. (validity generalization)
|
22 |
Peterson, N. G., Jeanneret, P. R. (1997). Job analysis: Overview and description of deductive methods. In D. L. Whetzel & G. R. Wheaton (Eds.). Applied methods in industrial psychology (pp. 13-50). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
|
23 |
Peterson, N.G., Mumford, M.D., Borman, W.C., Jeanneret, P.R., & Fleishman, E.A. (1999). An occupational information system for the 21st century: The development of O*NET. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
|
24 |
Rodriguez, D., Patel, R., Bright, A., Gregory, D., & Gowing, M.K. (2002). Developing competency models to promote integrated human resource practices. Human Resource Management. Vol. 41, p. 309-324.
|
25 |
Sanchez, J.I. & Fraser, S.L. (1992). On the choice of scales for task analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(4), 545-553.
|
26 |
Schippman, J.S. (1999). Strategic job modeling: Working at the core of integrated human resources. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
|
* |
Schmitt, N. Gilliland, S. W., Landis, R. S., & Devine, D. (1993). Computer-based testing applied to selection of secretarial applicants. Personnel Psychology, 46, 149-165. (**required to read—how to apply JA to development of selection tests in the field)
|
27 |
Schneider, B., & Knoz, A. M. (1989). Strategic job analysis. Human Resource Management, 28(1), 51-63.
|
28 |
Tannenbaum, R.J., & Wesley, S. (1993). Agreement between committee-based and field-based job analyses: A study in the context of licensure testing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 975-980.
|
29 |
Truxillo, D. M., Paronto, M. E., & Collins, M. (2004). Effects of Subject Matter Expert Viewpoint on Job Analysis Results. Public Personnel Management, 33(1), 33-46.
|
30 |
Williams, K. M., & Crafts, J. L. (1997). Inductive job analysis: The job/task inventory method. In D. L. Whetzel & G. R. Wheaton (Eds.). Applied measurement methods in industrial psychology, Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. (p. 51-89)
|
31 |
Wilson, M. A., Harvey, R. J., & Macy, B. A. (1990). Repeating items to estimate the test-retest reliability of task inventory ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 158-163. |